<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worst Practices in Legal Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/</link>
	<description>A Vision and a Road Map</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Salkin</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Salkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.wordpress.com/?p=186#comment-381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. The Socratic method. It needs to go away. While it certainly may encourage students to read cases so they don&#039;t sound stupid in class, it isn&#039;t the best pedagogical method. It is annoying (if not scary) for the &quot;victim&quot; while often more dull than informative to the rest of the class. And, since people are more interested in being ready to answer the questions thrown at them, they don&#039;t fully absorb the material they read. Instead, they find shortcuts to get the answers and don&#039;t remember what they read last week. However, that&#039;s not to say students shouldn&#039;t be involved, but they should want to be involved rather than thinking being involved is necessary evil of law school. The Socratic method makes a positive into a negative...very quickly.

2. Teaching out of a textbook while ignoring real life practice scenarios. The &quot;here&#039;s the law&quot; approach doesn&#039;t help when the law says X and Y, but 95% of practicing attorneys do X and find Y to be absurd for A, B, and C reasons that aren&#039;t in the textbook. The adjuncts teach &quot;real&quot; law while the academic, full time professors tend to teach the &quot;textbook&quot; law.

3. Once a semester tests. Students should be taught the material, given exercises to reinforce the material (with feedback), and be tested at least twice a semester.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The Socratic method. It needs to go away. While it certainly may encourage students to read cases so they don&#8217;t sound stupid in class, it isn&#8217;t the best pedagogical method. It is annoying (if not scary) for the &#8220;victim&#8221; while often more dull than informative to the rest of the class. And, since people are more interested in being ready to answer the questions thrown at them, they don&#8217;t fully absorb the material they read. Instead, they find shortcuts to get the answers and don&#8217;t remember what they read last week. However, that&#8217;s not to say students shouldn&#8217;t be involved, but they should want to be involved rather than thinking being involved is necessary evil of law school. The Socratic method makes a positive into a negative&#8230;very quickly.</p>
<p>2. Teaching out of a textbook while ignoring real life practice scenarios. The &#8220;here&#8217;s the law&#8221; approach doesn&#8217;t help when the law says X and Y, but 95% of practicing attorneys do X and find Y to be absurd for A, B, and C reasons that aren&#8217;t in the textbook. The adjuncts teach &#8220;real&#8221; law while the academic, full time professors tend to teach the &#8220;textbook&#8221; law.</p>
<p>3. Once a semester tests. Students should be taught the material, given exercises to reinforce the material (with feedback), and be tested at least twice a semester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Bliss</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Bliss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.wordpress.com/?p=186#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failing to show genuine interest in whether the students are learning, by solely lecturing without incorporating discussion, problem solving, or other active learning techniques.  I will never forget my corporations professor.  He came in to every class with the book, walked up to the podium, opened it up, looked down, and read aloud without projecting his voice or ever looking up.  Scintillating!  So - I remember the professor quite well, but I don&#039;t remember a thing about the law of corporations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failing to show genuine interest in whether the students are learning, by solely lecturing without incorporating discussion, problem solving, or other active learning techniques.  I will never forget my corporations professor.  He came in to every class with the book, walked up to the podium, opened it up, looked down, and read aloud without projecting his voice or ever looking up.  Scintillating!  So &#8211; I remember the professor quite well, but I don&#8217;t remember a thing about the law of corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Kaas</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrie Kaas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.wordpress.com/?p=186#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lecturing at the front of a class, with eyes closed, and refusing to answer questions. 

Failing to realize that students have various different learning styles, and teaching just to the type of learner that the professor is, rather than using a variety of teaching methods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lecturing at the front of a class, with eyes closed, and refusing to answer questions. </p>
<p>Failing to realize that students have various different learning styles, and teaching just to the type of learner that the professor is, rather than using a variety of teaching methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Floyd</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Floyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.wordpress.com/?p=186#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing to grade our students based solely on one exam at the end of the course, with little or no formative assessment during the course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing to grade our students based solely on one exam at the end of the course, with little or no formative assessment during the course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoinette Sedillo Lopez</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2008/04/25/worst-practices-in-legal-education/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antoinette Sedillo Lopez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.wordpress.com/?p=186#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demeaning students rather than teaching them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demeaning students rather than teaching them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

