Radical Reform?

Check out the series of short three to five page articles on Radical Proposals to Reform Legal Pedagogy. 43 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 595-650 (2008). (Go to Articles)  You’ll find a number of Best Practices themes.

Suggestions run heavily toward  “more clinical and experiential.” That’s Erwin Chemerinsky’s pitch straight up.  Will look forward to seeing what he does at  the new UC Irvine.  Beth Cohen  sets out a similar argument dressed up in an analogy to language immersion schools.

“Most entertaining” prize?  My vote says it’s a tie.   John Henry Schlegel  argues we should admit 18 -year-olds who might tolerate the infantilizing effects of law school, or 30-year-olds, who won’t, but not 22-year-olds. Peggy Cooper Davis favors “Slaying the Three Headed Dragon” — read her piece to identify the dragon’s heads.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.