<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objection! Helping Clinical Students Practice Trial Skills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2010/01/14/objection-helping-clinical-students-practice-trial-skills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2010/01/14/objection-helping-clinical-students-practice-trial-skills/</link>
	<description>A Vision and a Road Map</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elmer Masters</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2010/01/14/objection-helping-clinical-students-practice-trial-skills/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elmer Masters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/?p=1171#comment-2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may want to take a look at the CALI Lessons in Evidence, including these Lessons listed at http://u.cali.org/ryk4 - &quot;Impeachment and Rehabilitation of Witnesses&quot;, &quot;Character Evidence Under Federal Rules&quot;, &quot;Survey of Evidence&quot;, &quot;The Hearsay Rule &amp; Its Exceptions&quot;. The Lesson are available to Albany students as part of the school&#039;s CALI membership. 
In addition you can use the LessonLink feature to generate unique, trackable URLs for the Lessons to track student performance. See details for Lessonlink at http://www.cali.org/lessonlink.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to take a look at the CALI Lessons in Evidence, including these Lessons listed at <a href="http://u.cali.org/ryk4" rel="nofollow">http://u.cali.org/ryk4</a> &#8211; &#8220;Impeachment and Rehabilitation of Witnesses&#8221;, &#8220;Character Evidence Under Federal Rules&#8221;, &#8220;Survey of Evidence&#8221;, &#8220;The Hearsay Rule &amp; Its Exceptions&#8221;. The Lesson are available to Albany students as part of the school&#8217;s CALI membership.<br />
In addition you can use the LessonLink feature to generate unique, trackable URLs for the Lessons to track student performance. See details for Lessonlink at <a href="http://www.cali.org/lessonlink" rel="nofollow">http://www.cali.org/lessonlink</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha Howell</title>
		<link>http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/2010/01/14/objection-helping-clinical-students-practice-trial-skills/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samantha Howell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestpracticeslegaled.albanylawblogs.org/?p=1171#comment-2168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished playing a few rounds of the Objection! demo and it seems to be a better alternative to the one we have been using (You Be the Judge). My only criticism is that you have to answer either all the questions right or in speed-demon time to advance to the next round and it doesn&#039;t seem to give you much time to read the question and answer. But, on the other hand, that&#039;s pretty realistic, isn&#039;t it?
 
There are decent explanations and it lists the possible objections for you, so I wasn&#039;t faced with the problem w/ You Be The Judge where I was trying to guess how to phrase the objection. Also, this game allows for multiple different objections to some of the questions. So far, I think this is a better option than You Be The Judge and, even if a clinic student doesn&#039;t advance, a couple rounds of the game should get them brushed up on objections fairly well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished playing a few rounds of the Objection! demo and it seems to be a better alternative to the one we have been using (You Be the Judge). My only criticism is that you have to answer either all the questions right or in speed-demon time to advance to the next round and it doesn&#8217;t seem to give you much time to read the question and answer. But, on the other hand, that&#8217;s pretty realistic, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>There are decent explanations and it lists the possible objections for you, so I wasn&#8217;t faced with the problem w/ You Be The Judge where I was trying to guess how to phrase the objection. Also, this game allows for multiple different objections to some of the questions. So far, I think this is a better option than You Be The Judge and, even if a clinic student doesn&#8217;t advance, a couple rounds of the game should get them brushed up on objections fairly well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

